Skip to Main Content
Contact US


(713) 804-8149

You’ve no doubt encountered the words “lawyer” and “attorney” more times than you can count when researching legal matters.

And like most people, you’ve probably defaulted to using these two title designations as acceptable substitutes for one another.

After all, they both refer to folks who attain credentials, deftly maneuver through reams of inscrutable legalese, and make handsome livings as skilled advocates and counselors of law, right?

So they must be interchangeable labels, yes? Two sides of the exact same ample-briefcase-carrying coin?

Not quite.

While the terms are closely related and often uttered in one warm breath, the nuanced differences between the legal terminology of what constitutes a lawyer versus an attorney are quite meaningful. Conflating them as perfect synonyms could actually undermine your precise legal scenarios.

It’s critical you understand how these titles diverge – in responsibilities, oversights, recognitions, and jurisdictional applications. Because using them carelessly and interchangeably may leave you disappointed when you need the specialized legal expertise only one designation can truly provide.

Lawyer vs. Attorney: Differences in Roles in Law

At the highest level, lawyers represent a broader umbrella designation encompassing multiple legal professional roles and domains. Attorneys are a distinct sub-category nestled within that umbrella focused on specific litigation territories.

Here is a more specific breakdown of the lawyer vs. attorney differences:


A lawyer is any individual who has attained the core educational degree and licensing credentials to practice law and provide skilled legal counsel in a given state or territory.

Earning the prestigious “JD” (Juris Doctorate) law degree and passing the mandatory bar examination in their jurisdiction are the two critical steps to legally earn the title of lawyer.

As such, lawyers are free to apply their legal expertise in wide-ranging fields and capacities such as:

  • Providing legal counsel, advocacy, and document drafting to individuals or corporations
  • Acting as third-party advisors and mediators helping negotiate settlements
  • Serving municipal, state, or federal governance roles like prosecutors, judges, legislators
  • Consulting on legal regulatory compliance, risk, policy issues for organizations

And critically, lawyers can also serve in the specific attorney role we’ll define momentarily. But again, lawyers represent a broader designation not necessarily constrained to litigation. This is important to remember when trying to understand the lawyer vs. attorney differences.


Attorneys are a more specialized subset of lawyers who have taken their training and licensure one crucial step further:

They are legally certified to represent clients as advocates in courts of law – which lawyers without attorney status cannot do.

Within the judicial system and official litigation proceedings, no matter any jurisdictional variations, only attorneys have clearance to:

  • File legal complaints and lawsuits on behalf of plaintiffs
  • Set legal motions into action before judges and courts
  • Argue civil or criminal cases in court as representative advocates
  • Provide of counsel support for defendants in legal proceedings

Essentially, attorneys are the only legal professionals licensed to initiate formal lawsuit actions and directly represent clients throughout the entirety of in-court legal proceedings. All lawyers are not necessarily granted the same clearances.

Does this difference, as far as lawyer vs. attorney is concerned, seem subtle? Perhaps. But it constitutes an absolutely seismic jurisdictional distinction when facing actual litigation matters with potentially thousands or millions of dollars at stake.

Which is precisely why it’s so critical for individuals and organizations to understand the precise lawyer vs. attorney differentiator – especially when evaluating your perfect legal partnership needs.

Lawyer vs. Attorney: How does the educational and credentialing process differ?

For both career paths, earning a Juris Doctor (JD) degree from an accredited law school is the first critical step – there is no differentiation at this stage of the process between aspiring lawyers or attorneys.

The first fork in their professional roads occurs upon completing law school, when JD-holders must pass the bar examination held in whichever state jurisdiction they wish to be licensed to practice law. Passing this test certifies them as an official lawyer in that state.

To then go one step further and become licensed as an attorney able to litigate actively in state courts, those same lawyers must:

  • Apply and qualify for “attorney” licensure in their state’s bar association
  • Pass an additional bar examination focused on litigation protocols
  • Meet state character and fitness standards for attorney admission

So to summarize the lawyer vs. attorney discussion – both lawyers and attorneys start their credentialing journey at law school, but then attorneys take extra certification steps beyond just the core bar exam.

Lawyer vs. Attorney: Are attorneys considered more prestigious or accomplished than lawyers by default?

Not necessarily – the designations are simply focused on divergent responsibilities and jurisdictional clearances rather than any structured hierarchy of legal career prestige.

While becoming an attorney certainly requires clearing more accreditation hurdles, practicing lawyers who do not pursue attorney licensure often make that intentional choice. Perhaps they have no interest in litigation and prefer sticking to advisory or governance legal roles. Or they seek to avoid the added administrative headaches and ethical rules that fall upon attorneys.

There are countless examples of incredibly prestigious general lawyers, chief legal officers, judges, law professors, and policy influencers who purposefully never pursued formal attorney certification.

Likewise, many practicing attorneys start their careers as ambulance-chasing personal injury case-grinders in your average small law firms – not exactly the most prestigious settings imaginable.

So while becoming an attorney represents a career commitment to litigation, it absolutely does not inherently equate to more guaranteed respect or elite status over all other types of lawyers.

Lawyer vs. Attorney: Are attorney-client privileges different than standard lawyer-client privileges?

This is where those subtle differences between lawyers and attorneys take on massive real-world significance. While all lawyers enjoy some degree of attorney-client privilege regarding communications with the clients they advise, attorneys’ privileges extend even further due to their in-court litigation duties.

Because attorneys must intimately know their client’s full background, motivations and perspectives to effectively represent them in court – all information conveyed during that eternal privilege remains sacred. It is almost never admissible as evidence or testimony even after the fact.

Lawyers serving as general in-house counsel or policy advisors without litigation responsibilities do not enjoy the full privilege protections that shield an attorney’s work on active cases.

Is it possible for one person to be credentialed as both a lawyer and attorney simultaneously?

Absolutely! In fact, this dual-role arrangement is actually incredibly common in the legal profession.

There is no prohibition keeping a fully credentialed lawyer from also clearing the additional requirements to become a licensed, practicing attorney as well. Many legal professionals earn both designations early in their careers to maximize career flexibility.

Having the ability to represent clients as a general adviser and counselor OR directly advocate for them through formal litigation proceedings creates significant professional opportunities. It is a highly recommended path for those valuing long-term professional agility within the legal field.

Contact Us

Do you still have lingering questions about the nuanced differences between lawyers and attorneys? Or perhaps you need assistance determining which type of legal professional is truly best suited for your specific situation? At Husain Law + Associates — Houston Accident & Injury Lawyers, P.C., our experts have you covered. Our team is well-versed in making these crucial distinctions and can provide tailored guidance on your next steps. Call (713) 804-8149 to get the legal insight and partnering plan you can be confident is properly tailored for success.


About the Author


Husain Law Firm

Nomaan K. Husain is the founder of Husain Law + Associates — Houston Accident & Injury Lawyers, P.C., a Houston-based law firm specializing in Litigation, Immigration, and Aviation. He is Board Certified in Civil Trial Law and Personal Injury Trial Law, with law licenses in Texas, New York, and other jurisdictions. Mr. Husain serves in key community roles, including as Commissioner on President Biden's White House Commission on Fellowships and Chairman of Houston's Asian American Pacific Islander Advisory Board. He's been recognized with several awards, such as the Global Leader Award from the Houston World Affairs Council.

Read More